What is circular about the observation that the two ideological 'taggants' overlap?

The reason that it doesn't surprise me is more to do with simplicity, the idea that you do not like it if someone else is right.

As for off topic, that is exactly what you are doing here, I am following?, no, as I prefer to remain on topic, art vs porn.

You just didn't like the "can't prove anything stuff", and the not a "catch 22" stuff either......get over yourself will you!

So how do we disect art from porn and respect the obvious overlapping in the ideology when we deal with pornographic art?

The agenda for porn can also be a learning experiance, but is very clear when you watch porn, that that is what it is. But when you watch a movie, and the characters make love in a scene, you know it isn't pornographic, why do we find the distinction so easily, when it seems so subtle, and the definability of the actions rest in the same
parameters?



------------------